« Computer Weekly readers name Steve Jobs as greatest IT person of last 40 years - could it be more ironic? | Main | What do PR people actually do all day? PR Week finally answers the question »

October 31, 2006

Comments

Ed Lee

is rupert saying the amount of coverage he gives you is directly proportionate to the amount of beer you buy him?

who said ethics are dead?

Ed

Andrew Smith

I believe that is a meaningful interpretation of the equation ;-)

Rupert

That's merely one factor! And I don't mind buying (some of) the beer - it just has to be 'involved'.

Andrew suggested that some factors could be expanded. I agree. Beer, for example, specifically excludes American Budweiser and Becks.

There are also various problems with the formula as it stands, as if any of the parameters go to zero the probability either zeros or goes to infinity - and that's not true (well, with the exception of the words 'leader' or 'leading'. No greater sin exists.)

Best to see it as a guideline rather than a mathematical guarantee. Further revisions will be forthcoming, following the peer (and beer) review process

Rupert

Mary Branscombe

There should be a factor in the function similar to 2D/M where D = technology ready and available for demonstration by engineers/product developers/other knowledgeable people. This trends to higher values when hands on demos and review samples are available and to lower values when the demo is run by someone who knows less about the product than the journalist (see M), when the demo turns out to be a canned recording or when the technology is not actually in any state to be delivered or may not even have been approved as a project.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Quotes

LastFM Albums

Music taste

Current status

Google Shared Items

  • Google Shared

Technorati Authority

NewsNow

  • NewsNow

My Online Status

Blog powered by Typepad

Statcounter

  • StatCounter