Tim Ferriss' book, The Four Hour Work Week, is clearly the business/lifestyle title du jour. Having now topped the New York Times and WSJ best seller lists, he is gaining a cult following over here in the UK and Europe.
In simple terms, it is a book about "lifestyle design" - or how to do the things you really want to do in your life and earn enough cash to do them without having to work 80 hours a week- and wait until 60 to retire.
There's obviously a lot more to it than this - he's very cleverly taken a lot of themes from existing business books on things like the 80/20 rule and wrapped them up with some original insights of his own.
One of the cornerstones of his approach is what he describes as the "Low Information Diet". A common theme running throughout the book is the call to minimise the amount of information input you have to deal with - and focus on maximum output. For example, in terms of e-mail, he recommends an auto responder that says you will only check e-mail twice a day - once at 11am and once at 4pm. If people really need to call you, then you give them a mobile number - according to Ferris, this drastically reduces the number of so-called urgent disruptions you get in a day. (Wonder how many PRs or journalists could get away with this?)
However, he has an even more radical approach to reading newspapers and magazines - namely, not reading them at all. He claims to have not read a newspaper in 5 years. He devotes a couple of hours per month to reading one trade mag. And according to him, it has had no negative impact on his life or ability to generate income whatsover. In fact, quite the reverse.
From a PR and publishing perspective, this has some interesting implications. His book is clearly very popular. So what if people start adopting Ferriss' low information diet in great numbers? Will magazine and newspaper circulations begin to fall further as people take this credo to heart and ignore virtually all printed mattter (or other media)?
To be fair to Ferris, he does suggest trying the low information diet for a week or month to see if you can truly remove your addiction - would be interesting to see how many PRs or journalists could get away with adpoting this approach - but perhaps we can indulge in a mass experiment to see if our lives are significantly changed in any way by doing it......
Smithy - Have not read the book, but your précis of the low information diet section gives the impression that newspapers, magazines are only read for work-relevant information, as opposed to for their own sake because people are interested in what's going on in the world and feeling connected to a collective humanity.
Posted by: Ben Roome | September 21, 2007 at 02:09 PM
Ben - his point is in relation to work-relevant info - the thrust of his argument would be that if you want to read then it should be as a result of freeing up your time to do that - because that's what you want to do - although if you read his blog he does seem to advocate an extreme position that suggests most media consumption is a waste of time.....
Posted by: Andrew Smith | September 21, 2007 at 04:35 PM
Hi Andrew
It's an interesting point, but personally not reading newspapers and magazines would seriously compromise my ability to generate income.
As an example, I was reading an article in the Virgin Trains magazine yesterday, which gave me an idea I pitched to an HR title.
Given that half the stuff I do is probably pitched proactively, I can't see another way of generating new ideas and seeing what's already been done. And I'd imagine the same applies to PR types, no?
Posted by: Sally Whittle | September 28, 2007 at 11:36 AM
Hi Sally - I agree that his argument does somewhat fall down in relation to jobs and professions that hinge upon reading newspapers, mags, blogs, etc - like PR and journalism. But I suspect he would suggest making sure that the amount of time you do spend on these activities is kept to a productive minimum - ie don't let "research" become an open ended time sink. In fact, he'd argue that any job that relies on you devoting large amounts of time to it is not one to have. To create your ideal lifestyle, you need to :
a) have your business
b) sell a product not a service
c) make it web based
d) outsource everything
e) generate the income you need to do what you reall want without having to spend time on it
Easy, eh? ;-)
Posted by: Andrew Smith | September 28, 2007 at 03:17 PM
sxtacwip jahei zjgv mqwib mwxs ytucq nmlvue
Posted by: ofrpsl sotj | April 02, 2009 at 11:56 AM
This comprises not only
training on labor rights for workers and management, but also a more holistic approach that looks at the duties of workers and management. As labor mobility continues to affect both our corporate supply chain and local economies as a whole, it is clear that workers and managers have to work toward building a sense of community. This of course covers not only workplace issues, but also the environment in which our factories operate. As cheap puma ferrari shoes success grows, we will also be communicating more of our corporate accountability efforts. In particular, we hope to work with more partners that can help us more effectively and efficiently address social and environmental issues. We believe that this would help us sustain our pilot projects and develop new programs as the need arises, ensuring that the Momentum built prior to 2008 will continue. Building Momentum is a deliberate and purposeful act, and we hope that with this report we have exhibited our good faith and corporate accountability.
Posted by: Puma Shoes | October 21, 2011 at 03:07 AM
Lapped The Benefit Of Converse Acquisition-Nike acquired Converse in September 2003. Over the last four quarters the acquisition has been additive to sales and earnings. While we think Converse will continue to be a benefit, the year over year benefit will solely reflect the growth of the business going forward.
Posted by: kids Air Jordan Shoes | November 24, 2011 at 06:33 AM